Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Contemporary Reflections on Death Have Been Cremated

The New York Times’ Gabrielle Glasser wrote an article last month entitled, “The Funeral: Your Last Chance to Be a Big Spender.” In this article, Glasser noted various ways that the funeral business has adapted to the changing desires of society, in particular the desire for people “to have what they want.” Thus, the industry has made special caskets for “bikers” so that they can be pulled by a Harley rather than a traditional hearse; or gardeners can select a variety of wildflowers to be included in their funeral plans.

Glasser also noted the number of changes that are resulting from the rising costs of funerals. She writes:

The death industry is facing something of an existential crisis. Cremation, which can reduce costs by half or more, is a strong trend. (The average cost of a funeral and traditional burial is about $8,000.) Families are increasingly abandoning traditional religious funerals, which are typically organized by funeral directors, in favor of secular ceremonies they may arrange themselves. Natural burials, which avoid embalming and concrete burial vaults, are more commonly considered than they once were, while a minority of families are bypassing funeral homes altogether to take care of their dead themselves.

The rise of cremation in the past forty years has been astounding, with cremation now accounting for more than 38 percent of all burials, in comparison to just 26 percent in 2000. Jerry Sullivan, a second generation funeral director remarks, “And if you care a little bit less about ceremony, and are ready to allow your body to go up in smoke, then all of the trappings of traditional funerals matter less as well — like fancy caskets.”

As a Christian, I believe that the church must give greater reflection to the moral issues surrounding death and how we handle our dead. Is burial nothing more than the disposal of a person’s housing—with the real person (i.e., soul) having already “departed to be with the Lord?” If it is, then certainly better reasons must be given for cremation than “it cuts funeral costs in half” or one is prepared to “go up in smoke.”

To be sure, the Vatican’s decision in 1963 to lift its ban on cremation has led to more individuals choosing this route. But is there something more that has sparked an even greater surge in the choice of cremation. In his article “Grave Signs,” Russell Moore draws attention to how Abraham buried his wife Sarah in the cave at Mamre and how those closest to Jesus sought to prepare his body for burial after the crucifixion. The point he so powerfully makes is that the people of God deal with their dead in a way that not only honors them, but also in a way that historically has been drastically different than the pagan world. Indeed, Stephen Prothero’s Purified by Fire: A History of Cremation in America emphatically demonstrates how the practice of cremation practically disappeared in areas where the church spread, finding continued practice only among those who rejected a future resurrection of the body.

Consequently, questions remain: Can Christians morally choose cremation? Or an even greater question, will Christians even ask the question?

9 comments:

  1. John,

    First, I am excited to read your first post! What a great idea to start your posting career with such a peppy topic!!

    I am the first to admit that this is not a topic I have deeply considered. I always deemed it best to consider the wishes of the deceased.

    If there is consensus that Christians should not cremate, a nice secondary question might be whether the church should help subsidize ceremonies for families who cannot afford the escalating and ridiculous funeral costs.

    I am not advocating that but thought it might be a fun question!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree. To be sure, this is what it means to be part of a covenant community--something like Acts 5. Moreover, that same community ought to be part of the discussion in how one deals with the funeral as well. If anything, it is NOT a personal decsion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. John, nice way to come out swinging! :) Nice posts!

    Your first post - the artificial insemination must go, then - cremation is out. I guess that's why they call you 'the boxer', right?

    In my view cremation not in any way inconsistent with Christianity. Why would the physical act of funeral or disposing of the body of the deceased need to be different than the practice of 'the world'? Christians should certainly have different attitudes during funeral than non-Christians do, but if we say that the manner of burial must be different, then I think more reasons must be shown for why this is the case. Also - if cremation is rejected on this grounds, then certainly there must be more discussion about other specific funeral and burial practices.
    The other possible reason to reject cremation on Christian grounds would be related to the future resurrection of the body, but that argument certainly doesn't go very far. (decomposition of even the body buried whole; restoration of imperfect bodies in the new heavens and the new earth; and other issues).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Historically, what Jekabs pointed out is exactly why the Church rejected cremation. The burial of the body was seen as a witness to the promise of the resurrection.

    But, if you think about it, if we recognize that the current body will be decomposed, and that the entire structure of the body will not only be reanimated but also transformed in a way not unlike Christ's body, then is one really rejecting this hope by cremation?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Here's a short introduction to the Christian catacombs:

    http://campus.belmont.edu/honors/catacombs/catacombs.htm

    Another thing to throw into the mix of this topic is the way Christians of the first few centuries typically venerated the bones of the martyrs and later the tombs of the martyrs. They literally understood themselves to be surrounded in the places of worship by the physical witness of the heroes of the faith.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for the link to the catacombs site. That was very interesting!

    ReplyDelete
  7. The question is not whether or not God can take a cremated body and make it whole . . . or for that matter, one that has been lost at see, or destroyed in war? Certainly our God can do that? The question hinges on what we as Christians DO with our bodies and how we handle the dead. Historically, cremation was practiced as a demonstration that there was no bodily resurrection; this is there statement, not Christianity's understanding of it.

    I have never liked arguments from silence, but here I must at leats put one forth. If how the people of God deal with their dead is NOT important, then why are there no biblical examples of them just throwing them in the trash or "burning" them? Surely they believed also that their God could resurrect the "decomposed" body!

    Great discussion guys.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I guess my question is not whether cremation traditionally has stood for a non-Christian viewpoint on the body and its future, but whether it continues to do so. Is there anything inherent in the practice that would lead one (or one's culture over time) to a Hindu or Gnostic view of the body?

    ReplyDelete
  9. So at least in some ways this seems to be a discussion about the importance of tradition.

    ReplyDelete